Full DeFi Platform vs Asset-Focused Chain
Ergo has Turing-incomplete but powerful ErgoScript; Ravencoin has limited asset scripts
Ergo supports DEXs, lending, stablecoins; Ravencoin is asset issuance only
Ergo has Sigma Protocols; Ravencoin has no privacy features
Ergo has storage rent; Ravencoin has no long-term security mechanism
| Feature | Ergo | Ravencoin |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | Autolykos PoW | KAWPOW PoW |
| Smart Contracts | Full (ErgoScript) | Limited (asset scripts) |
| Token Focus | General purpose + tokens | Asset issuance focused |
| DeFi | Active ecosystem | None |
| Privacy | Sigma Protocols, ErgoMixer | None |
| State Model | eUTXO | UTXO + asset layer |
| Long-term Security | Storage rent | Fees only |
| Fair Launch | Yes | Yes |
| Messaging | Via contracts | Native messaging |
indicates advantage in that category. Last updated: 2025-01-01
Ravencoin was designed specifically for asset issuance with limited scripting. Ergo's ErgoScript enables complex DeFi: DEXs, stablecoins, lending protocols, and more. If you need more than token transfers, Ergo is the choice.
Full DeFi capabilities vs simple asset transfers.
Both support native tokens without smart contracts. Ravencoin has unique features like messaging and restricted assets. Ergo tokens can participate in complex DeFi protocols and smart contracts.
Tokens can be used in DeFi, not just transferred.
Ravencoin has no privacy features. Ergo provides Sigma Protocols for zero-knowledge proofs and ErgoMixer for transaction mixing, enabling private transfers when needed.
Optional privacy for sensitive transactions.
Both face the post-emission challenge. Ergo's storage rent provides sustainable miner income. Ravencoin must rely entirely on transaction fees, which may not sustain security.
Storage rent ensures long-term security budget.
Join thousands of users who chose decentralization, security, and financial freedom.