Modern Smart Contract PoW vs Classic Payment Coin
Ergo has full ErgoScript contracts; Litecoin has Bitcoin-like limited scripting
Ergo uses Sigma Protocols (ZK proofs); Litecoin added MWEB (MimbleWimble)
Ergo has active DEXs and stablecoins; Litecoin has no DeFi
Ergo: research-driven with novel features; Litecoin: conservative Bitcoin fork
| Feature | Ergo | Litecoin |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | Autolykos PoW (ASIC-resistant) | Scrypt PoW (ASIC-dominated) |
| Smart Contracts | Full (ErgoScript) | Limited (Bitcoin-like) |
| Privacy | Sigma Protocols, ErgoMixer | MWEB (opt-in) |
| DeFi | Active ecosystem | None |
| Block Time | ~2 minutes | ~2.5 minutes |
| State Model | eUTXO | UTXO |
| Long-term Security | Storage rent | Fees only |
| Adoption | Growing | Established |
| Fair Launch | Yes | Yes (early mining) |
indicates advantage in that category. Last updated: 2025-01-01
Litecoin was created as 'silver to Bitcoin's gold' - a faster, lighter Bitcoin for payments. Ergo was built from scratch with smart contracts, privacy, and sustainability as core features. Different visions, different capabilities.
Built for DeFi and programmable money from day one.
Litecoin has Bitcoin-like scripting - useful for basic multi-sig but not DeFi. Ergo's ErgoScript enables DEXs, stablecoins, lending, and complex financial applications.
Full DeFi capabilities vs payment-only functionality.
Litecoin added MWEB (MimbleWimble Extension Blocks) for optional privacy. Ergo uses Sigma Protocols enabling zero-knowledge proofs. Both offer opt-in privacy with different technical approaches.
Sigma Protocols are more flexible for smart contract privacy.
Litecoin mining is dominated by ASICs, concentrating hash power. Ergo's Autolykos remains GPU-friendly, keeping mining accessible to individuals.
More decentralized mining participation.
Join thousands of users who chose decentralization, security, and financial freedom.