Smart Contract PoW vs Speed-Focused PoW
Ergo has full smart contract support via ErgoScript; Kaspa is payments-only (smart contracts planned)
Ergo offers Sigma Protocols and ErgoMixer; Kaspa has no native privacy
Ergo has storage rent for post-emission security; Kaspa relies on fees only
Ergo has NiPoPoWs for trustless light clients; Kaspa uses SPV
| Feature | Ergo | Kaspa |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | Autolykos PoW (ASIC-resistant) | kHeavyHash PoW (ASIC-friendly) |
| Smart Contracts | Full support (ErgoScript) | None (planned) |
| Block Time | ~2 minutes | ~1 second |
| Privacy | Sigma Protocols, ErgoMixer | None |
| State Model | eUTXO (programmable) | UTXO (simple) |
| Long-term Security | Storage rent + fees | Fees only |
| Light Clients | NiPoPoWs (trustless) | SPV (trust-based) |
| Fair Launch | Yes (no premine) | Yes (no premine) |
| DeFi Ecosystem | Active (Spectrum, SigmaUSD) | None |
indicates advantage in that category. Last updated: 2025-01-01
Ergo launched with full smart contract support via ErgoScript, enabling DEXs, stablecoins, lending, and complex DeFi. Kaspa launched as a pure payment chain with smart contracts on the roadmap but not yet implemented.
Working DeFi ecosystem today vs promised future features.
Ergo's Autolykos is memory-hard and ASIC-resistant, keeping mining accessible to GPU owners. Kaspa's kHeavyHash has seen ASIC development, potentially centralizing mining.
GPU mining remains viable, promoting decentralization.
Both chains will eventually run out of block rewards. Ergo's storage rent provides additional miner income from unused UTXOs. Kaspa must rely entirely on transaction fees.
Storage rent ensures sustainable security budget.
Kaspa's BlockDAG achieves ~1 second blocks but requires complex consensus. Ergo's ~2 minute blocks are simpler and proven secure, with NiPoPoWs enabling fast verification.
Simpler, battle-tested design with light client support.
Join thousands of users who chose decentralization, security, and financial freedom.