Using Sigma-Rust in Resource-Constrained Environments

Back

The standard sigma-rust library provides comprehensive tools for working with Ergo protocols and data structures in Rust. However, environments like hardware wallets or embedded systems often have strict limitations on code size, memory usage, and available libraries (especially the standard library, std).

This guide outlines strategies and considerations for adapting sigma-rust for such resource-constrained environments.

Challenges

  • Code Size: The full sigma-rust library can be relatively large due to its extensive features and dependencies.
  • Memory Usage: Dynamic memory allocation (alloc) might be limited or unavailable.
  • Standard Library (std): Many embedded environments do not support the full Rust standard library (std), requiring no_std compatible code.
  • Crypto Dependencies: The default cryptographic backend (k256 crate for secp256k1 operations) might be too large or have dependencies unsuitable for the target environment.

Solutions & Approaches

1. sigma-rust-mini Fork

  • Concept: A community-maintained fork specifically designed for no_std environments and reduced footprint.
  • Repository: github.com/Alesfatalis/sigma-rust-mini/tree/no_std
  • Benefits: Pre-configured for no_std, likely includes necessary feature flag adjustments, and may already incorporate backend swaps.
  • Considerations: Might lag behind the main sigma-rust repository in terms of features or updates. Verify its maintenance status and compatibility with your required sigma-rust version.
  • When to Use: Often the easiest starting point for hardware wallet integration or no_std projects.

2. no_std Builds (Manual Configuration)

  • Concept: Attempt to compile the main sigma-rust library (or a specific subset) with the no_std feature flag enabled, potentially requiring manual adjustments to dependencies and features.
  • How: This typically involves modifying the Cargo.toml file:
    • Setting default-features = false.
    • Selectively enabling only the necessary features compatible with no_std.
    • Ensuring all dependencies also support no_std.
  • Challenges: Can be complex, as not all features or dependencies of the main sigma-rust library might be no_std compatible. Requires careful dependency management.
  • When to Use: If sigma-rust-mini is unsuitable or outdated, or if you need fine-grained control over included features.

3. Replacing the Cryptographic Backend (k256 -> secp256k1)

  • Problem: The default k256 crate used by sigma-rust for elliptic curve operations can be large or have std-dependent features. Hardware wallets often use the more lightweight, C-based secp256k1 library (via the secp256k1 Rust crate).
  • Solution: Modify sigma-rust (or sigma-rust-mini) to use the secp256k1 crate as the backend for cryptographic operations instead of k256.
  • Implementation Steps (High-Level):
    1. Dependency Change: Replace k256 with secp256k1 in Cargo.toml, ensuring no_std compatibility if needed (the secp256k1 crate often requires specific feature flags for no_std).
    2. Code Adaptation: Search the codebase for usages of k256 types and functions and replace them with their secp256k1 equivalents. Key areas include:
      • Secret Key / Private Key: k256::SecretKey -> secp256k1::SecretKey
      • Public Key: k256::PublicKey -> secp256k1::PublicKey
      • Signature: k256::ecdsa::Signature -> secp256k1::ecdsa::Signature
      • Key Generation: Random key generation might need adaptation.
      • Signing/Verification: Use the signing/verification methods from the secp256k1 crate.
      • Point Operations: Operations like point multiplication (mul_tweak) or addition (combine) needed for Diffie-Hellman proofs or signature aggregation must use the secp256k1 crate's functions. (Refer to the secp256k1 crate documentation for specific methods).
    3. Feature Flags: Ensure appropriate feature flags are enabled for both sigma-rust and secp256k1 to support the required operations in a no_std context.
  • Community Hints (from Keystone Integration): Developers integrating with Keystone hardware wallets successfully used this approach, specifically mentioning the need to map types like SecretKey, PublicKey and use methods like mul_tweak and combine from the secp256k1 crate.

Potential Pitfalls

  • global_allocator: In no_std environments that still require dynamic allocation (alloc), you need to define a global allocator. Issues can arise if multiple dependencies try to define conflicting allocators.
  • Dependency Hell: Ensuring all transitive dependencies are no_std compatible can be challenging. Use tools like cargo tree to inspect dependencies.
  • Feature Creep: Be mindful of enabling features in sigma-rust or its dependencies that might pull in std unexpectedly. Start with minimal features and add only what is necessary.
  • API Differences: The k256 and secp256k1 crates have different APIs. The replacement requires careful code changes, not just type renaming.
  • Testing: Thoroughly test the modified library on the target hardware or emulator, paying close attention to cryptographic operations and memory usage.

Conclusion

Adapting sigma-rust for resource-constrained environments is feasible but requires careful planning. Starting with sigma-rust-mini is often the recommended approach. If modifications are needed, replacing the cryptographic backend with the secp256k1 crate is a common and necessary step, particularly for hardware wallet integration. Always prioritize thorough testing on the target platform.